@adchempages Nevermind, I looked back and @ceolaf used “affective” first. I lost track of the edubabble. @kblummers @DataDiva
15 thoughts on “@adchempages Nevermind, I looked back and @ceolaf…”
Comments are closed.
@adchempages Nevermind, I looked back and @ceolaf used “affective” first. I lost track of the edubabble. @kblummers @DataDiva
Comments are closed.
@educatoral @ceolaf @kblummers @DataDiva HA! It’s easy to lose track of that nonsense!
@adchempages that seems delightfully vague. Affective education is edubabble but “physics envy” is legit? @educatoral @ceolaf
@DataDiva @educatoral @ceolaf Difference is that ‘physics envy’ is not masquerading as a ‘science’!
@DataDiva @educatoral @ceolaf or ‘research’!
@adchempages How are terms with specific meaning and understood by all in the conversation “nonsense?” @educatoral @kblummers @DataDiva
@adchempages 1) Is science the only domain where research can be done? 2) What is “masquerading” as science? @DataDiva @educatoral
@adchempages Weren’t you the one complaining about teachers without data? @DataDiva @educatoral
@ceolaf @DataDiva @educatoral 1) in a nutshell, and in 140, ‘yes’. Slightly more complicated, but not much.
@ceolaf @DataDiva @educatoral 2) Stuff based upon ‘research’ that isn’t research.
@ceolaf @DataDiva @educatoral Yes, but ‘physics envy’ doesn’t pretend to be a ‘science’.
@adchempages 1) Is your objection that the research is not quantitative? 2) not replicable? 3) Doesn’t use calculus? @DataDiva @educatoral
@adchempages 4) Is there no such thing as historical or archeological research? 5) Library research? @DataDiva @educatoral
@adchempages In a nutshell, how do you define “research” and how are these fields excluded from that? @DataDiva @educatoral
@adchempages Do particle physicists, astrophysicists and theoretical physicists all do research? Are all science? @DataDiva @educatoral
@adchempages Actually, isn’t that kinda exactly what “physics envy” refers to? @DataDiva @educatoral